WPC /^ yH?$g+VÕC57 j}#?fc'rJ9r%fl1YwҥED5Ծ.E6 x \dڸp Q(Z&`&D[mbPy!=Kob H^Qv ?\Qy 8 -4$Og3?4M SGB|G)EE z5DExs\E=(o L lbknct\h^>ʖӧ-!璈WiűZmJ9 D~Z|ZjGA2A`Adx cߎѓSŤ'UK theremovalpetition,thatfilingwasnotthe d beginningofthesuit.Forwhatwasremoved : wasthesuitthathadbeenbroughtinthe  Illinoisstatecourt,andunderIllinoislaw  thefilingofthecomplainthad"commenced" l thesuit.B` -` - Id.at726.ThesameistrueunderMassachusettslaw.Mass.R. > Civ.P.3(statingthatacivilactioniscommencedbyfilingofa  complaint);BigDCarpets,Inc.v.TheWelchGroup,Inc.,37Mass. F ! App.Ct.312,315(Mass.App.1994). !B# Ѐ ` Finally,weareunpersuadedbyPfizer'srelianceona #% lineofdistrictcourtdecisionsfollowingLorraineMotors,Inc.v. J% ' AetnaCas.&Sur.Co.,166F.Supp.319(E.D.N.Y.1958).Those &F") casesinvolvedlegislationincreasingtheamountincontroversy (#+ requirementandrestontherationalethatanactionshouldnotbe N*%- removablefromstatecourtwhenthatactioncouldnothavebeen +J'/ originallyinstitutedinfederalcourtonthedayitwasremoved  becausethejurisdictionalamounthadbeenraised.SeeLorraine \ Motors,166F.Supp.at323.Theyhavenorelevancehere. X  ` Theremandorderisaffirmed.